Showing posts with label show. Show all posts
Showing posts with label show. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Don't Tell. Show.
by

C. Neuroticus Absolutus

In search of the genius who was first to say, “Don't tell, show,” I found myriad entries on Google, but couldn't pin down a single originator, perhaps because I wasn't sure it was worth going through the 340,000,000 hits Google came up with in .19 seconds. I'd heard or read somewhere that Anton Chekhov was responsible for this construct of modern writing, so I Googled him next. The closest I could come to pinning the blame on Chekhov was one of his quotes: “Don't tell me the moon is shinning, show me the glint on broken glass.” Romantically descriptive. I'd ask Mr. Chekhov what he really meant, but sadly he died on July 15th, 1904, 109 years ago. After 109 years, is Mr. Chekhov still worthy of emulating? First, we must consider that Chekhov was Russian, so there is the translation from Russian to consider as well as the changes in culture, customs and habits from one society to another, and more than a century separating our work from his. With such dynamic activities as writing and language, it is amazing that Mr. Chekhov's 109-year-old proposal hasn't long been replaced by some other craze. Or has it?
As with the masterminds of any invention, Mr. Chekhov has a multitude of critics, including me, if he is truly the one responsible for this journalistic revolution. James Scott Bell tackles some of the conundrums of Show vs Tell in Chapter 8 of his book Revision & Self-Editing. Grammar Girl, in her infinite and web-based teaching of everything we should have learned in high school, has similar views concerning the application of the Show vs Tell.
It's not that this guideline isn't suitable for writing some literary genres, for it is. If your are writing an action packed spy novel, a shoot 'em up western, a lively adventure ala the Indiana Jones series or a blood-dripping vampire horror story, strong verbs and showing vis a vie telling are certainly a good choice. Note that I said a good choice, not the only choice. More about that later. Suffice to remember for now that showing is the realm of high-powered, stimulating action verbs. At least that is what writers have come to believe that Don't tell, Show means. But take a look back at Chekhov's original statement:. What does Chekhov's, “Don't tell me the moon is shinning, show me the glint on broken glass,” really mean? Where is his high-powered, stimulating action verb? Well, maybe that's not what Chekhov had in mind after all. “. . .the moon is shinning . . .” is a rather hum-drum observation. To paraphrase Chekhov, “Give the reader a hint of the effect of moonlight on the scene and let his imagination enjoy the discovery.”
For example, what if you're writing a romance novel, a travelogue, fantasy, sci-fi or literary fiction? Along these paths of discovery, appreciative readers will gladly slow down in order to sense the passion of a young lover's first kiss, feel the immensity of the Great Pyramid of Giza, visualize the horror or beauty of an alien life form, or enjoy a description of traveling the scenic Blue Ridge Parkway in spring. And more, to appreciate a turn of phrase, a rhythmic passage, an alluring alliteration, to follow the writer in probing the depths of a scientific investigation or a spiritual revelation. In such writing, adjectives and adverbs are appropriate and appreciated for adding flavor, texture, taste, insight, color, and feeling to the words we ingest from the page.
Even within the paragraphs and pages of the same book, there is room to accommodate both Show and Tell as partners in bringing a story to life, just as a mixture of nouns, pronouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs, prepositions, interjections, and conjunctions are necessary ingredients of a sentence.
Now I'll show you a story. Consider the following fictional situation:
In the final minute of the fifteenth round, Ruffian Ralph beat Boxer Bob furiously. Bob's legs wobbled, weakened. He shuffled around the ring, his tired arms barely able to fend off Ruffian's murderous attacks. Time and again, Ruffian penetrated Bob's defenses, swinging for a knock out. With each punch, torrents of sweat jumped from Bob's tortured body.
Bob fought back, struggled to overcome the pain that encompassed his entire being. He swung hard, mindlessly trading devastating punches, standing toe to toe with Ruffian. Renewed strength erupted from somewhere within and from each excited scream from the crowd. He heard them through the fog in his mind. He landed a solid right hook and suddenly it was his name that rocked the arena. “Bob! Bob! Bob!”
He sucked in a large breath of air and backed Ruffian to the ropes, landing punches at will. A viscous uppercut lifted Ruffian off his feet and he collapsed on the canvas. “One! Two! Three! . . . .” The referee shrieked.
Bob dragged himself to his corner and hung on the ropes.
“. . . Nine! TEN!” The referee 's count was lost in the crowd's cheers. He beckoned Bob from his corner and raised his gloved hand in victory.
Compare that with the following paragraph where I'll tell you the same story.
In the bout between Ruffian Ralph and Boxer Bob this evening, Boxer Bob withstood everything Ruffian threw at him until the last minute of the fifteenth round when Bob came to life and landed the winning uppercut that gave him the championship and the middleweight title. It's a summary in a single sentence, like a hurried TV news broadcaster trying to file the report before the next commercial.
If you're like me, you prefer the first story, the blow by blow account unfolds like watching Rocky Balboa in the Rocky film series. Also, please note that showing in this instance, takes more time, more space on the page. This is usually the case. Although the readers get the same basic information, showing provides descriptive details and permits time for not only tension to develop, but lets the characters and the story captivate their minds.
Telling, in it's most basic form, is perhaps best epitomized by the old Dragnet TV series where detective Joe Friday wants, “Just the facts, Ma'am, just the facts.”
But don't make the mistake of insisting that every passage be some action-packed drama. Give the reader a moment to rest. Narration, while telling, is a welcome rest for the reader and can move the story line forward at the same time. Choose a few adjectives and adverbs and sprinkle them judiciously while the reader rests in preparation for the next exciting bout of showing.
Chekhov is also connected to the modernist movement called the stream of consciousness, a literary style in which the reader is exposed to the ongoing thoughts, the emotional and psychological processes of the characters; it's often called the interior monologue. Every thought of one or more characters is presented to permit the reader to analyze what is going through the character's mind and understand what drives his actions, even though the character's thoughts may jump to completely unrelated subjects in the middle of this silent soliloquy. This style is like showing on meth and steroids. Not a single detail is considered too insignificant to include; but as the wealth of detail provided the reader is at first interesting, it quickly becomes overwhelming and counterproductive in advancing the story line. The best advice is to use interior monologue sparingly and to stay on subject. Some of the better known writers who have dared and succeeded in using this style are Virginia Woolf in To the Lighthouse, James Joyce in Ulysses and William Faulkner in The Sound and the Fury.
Bastard shot me The sonovabitch shot me in the stomach God that hurts Oh Christ look at all the blood on my shirt Where is he now Where's my gun My turn, damn you Get up Get up dammit My friggin legs won't move Gotta move He's gonna to kill me Is this how Dad felt when that yellow commie shot him in Korea It was winter then, cold and wet when he was shot Damned near froze to death he told us kids. He used to tell us that story all the―shit There he is He's pointing his gun at me again. Get down Get down Don't want to be shot again. Billy and me used to play G.I. Joe and we'd pretend to shoot each other and take turns falling down dead just like this but there weren't no blood Has anyone called an ambulance Where's the ambulance I need help A paramedic Look at all the blood I've Mom would whup me for all the blood I got on my shirt I see you there you dirty bastard Shoot him Shoot him quick There I got him I think I hit him. I don't think that deer I took last year bled this much A twelve pointer Looks good in the den Marie said she'd divorce me if I hung it there How many shots have I taken How much ammo do I have left Dad was real mad at me when he had to call 911 to rush me to the hospital that time when Am I gonna live Dear God don't let me die Wait did he just move I thought I got him Shoot him before you die Shoot the bastard. Kill him Oh Jesus please send an ambulance. Hasn't anyone called Is that you Billy Help me Billy Billy are you there
As you can see, stream of consciousness isn't for me. What I've learned is not to tell you I've fallen. I'll just show you the bruises on my ass.
There. I think I've got the hang of it.

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Shape Up, Mr. Dickens!

SHAPE UP, MR. DICKENS!

By

C. Neuroticus Absolutus

The pundits of successful writing tell us to make the first sentences of our stories leap off the page and grab the reader’s attention. Consider: “It was a dark and stormy night,” from Shultz’s character Snoopy’s novel which starts with that quote from the 1830 Bulwer-Lytton novel Paul Clifford. Make fun if you will, but is that beautiful or what? Only seven words to set the mood, the scene and to capture your interest.

Inspired by Snoopy, I’ve tried to write an introductory line with the same attention-grabbing impact. The best opening seven words I’ve ever penned are: “She had big tits, really big tits!”

Kind of grabs you, doesn’t it?

Some authorities advocate going through your manuscript and removing intensifiers every time they appear.

But, compare: “She has big tits,” to “She has really big tits.”

The first sentence describes a familiar sight: Large, but rather ho-hum breasts. The really in the second sentence—from my unpublished novel Bazoombas!—tells us there is something exceptional about these breasts. With these words the author reaches out from the page, snatches the reader’s attention and simultaneously provides a titillating image of the character’s attributes. I immediately want to know more about this character, especially her breasts. Is she proud of them? Apologetic? Are they perky? An obvious burden to her? Award-winning? The products of surgical augmentation? Do they hang below her waistline? Are they psychologically uplifting to her or a depressing nuisance? What other unusual attributes does she have? Curvaceous hips? Long lithe legs? Buck teeth? Pattern baldness? Thick ankles? You’ve captured my attention. Quick! Tell me more!

Forget ho-hum breasts. It was the intensifier really that grabbed your attention, admit it!

Ed Sullivan said, “We’ve got a really big show!” Substitute a stronger word, some might advise. But it’s not “a big show,” a great show, or amazing, huge, brilliant, humongous, elephantine, or even rhinocerine show . . . it’s “a REALLY BIG show!”

No, thank you, I’ll keep my intensifying verys and reallys. They’re intended for those who wish to follow me on my imaginary adventures—and have fun along the way.

The opening lines from Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities (1859) are often quoted:
“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all going direct the other way—in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.”
… to which our writing authorities might say something like, “Get to the point, Mr. Dickens. Don’t tell. Show! And for Pete’s sake, Charlie, get rid of that weak verb was. Worse, you used it eleven times!” Verbs must be strong, bust you in the chops, keep you on the edge of your seat our pundits insist. But I wonder how they would improve on Dickens’, “Marley was dead . . .” without raising the word count or inserting a bunch of adverbs and adjectives that will only get in the way of Dickens conveying a simple fact to the reader: “Marley was dead.” A be verb followed by a past participle? Tsk, tsk, Mr. Dickens, where’s the action?

What if I’m looking for a quiet read in my old wingback in front of the fireplace, my slippered feet on an ottoman? Many mature readers still like whodunits with detectives who use their brains instead of Aston Martins upgraded with MI6’s latest 007 spy package, Israeli Uzis, karate chops, 9 mm Austrian Glocks or Japanese ninja stars. Imagine:
  • Miss Marple at the wheel of the 1968 Mustang GT 390 fastback in the famous Bullit auto chase
  • The sophisticated Nick and Nora Charles as they duke it out with the Chinese mob ala Bruce Lee as Asta chews on Jet Li’s ankle (Oh, crap! I just used the deadly as construction—twice!—and buried the action in dependent clauses!)
  • Detective Joe Friday not getting the facts
  • Or Sherlock Holmes waiting for the results of a DNA analysis
Many of us still like characters who are humanly fallible, have humorous quirks, imperfect bodies and lack the slightest inkling of super powers. And all that constant action wears us out!

The proponents of removing -ly adverbs from your writing should check out the work of
J. K. Rowling, one of the best-selling authors of all time. Her liberal use of adverbs must drive them mad. Bless billion-dollar-author Rowling for ignoring their advice and writing a series so enjoyable that literally millions of children became avid readers, if only for seven delicious volumes. Through these young readers, adverbs might live on in our lexicon.

For the rest of us hopeful scribes and scribblers, be careful where you get your advice.

As for you, Mr. Dickens, shape up!